Back to Industry Thoughts
PowerGridData Center Development

The Grid Doesn't Read Press Releases

319 GW of data centers are announced. About 90 GW has broken ground. The real question is who delivers the electrons, and when.

SK

Stephen Klenert

SVP · 365 Data Centers

6 min read

Every week another gigawatt campus shows up in my feed. 5 GW in Louisiana. 7.7 GW in West Texas. 9 GW somewhere in the Utah desert.

I've spent over 20 years pulling fiber, building out suites and fighting for power at the meter. Before I get excited about any of these, I ask one question. Who is delivering the electrons, and when?

So I went and counted. As of August, public trackers show about 319 GW of US data center capacity planned or under construction (dcmap.us). About 90 GW of that has actually broken ground. The rest is a rendering and a load request sitting in somebody's utility queue.

For scale, the whole country averaged roughly 506 GW of load last year (4.43 trillion kWh, per EIA). The announced pipeline equals about a quarter of the nameplate capacity of every power plant in America. That isn't going to happen, and honestly it doesn't need to. The part that worries me is the slice that is real.

Announced or under construction
319 GW
Actually broken ground
~90 GW
Average US load, last year
~506 GW

Running the numbers

I pulled every power plant and every 230 kV and up line out of OpenStreetMap and totaled them. OSM tags about 1,193 GW of generation across 15,304 plants. It misses most of the wind fleet, so the real number is closer to 1.3 TW.

Nameplate is the wrong number to stare at. What matters is what shows up at 6 pm on the hottest day of August.

This year developers plan a record 86 GW of new capacity (EIA). That sounds great until you break it out. 43.4 GW is solar and 24.3 GW is batteries. Gas is 6.3 GW. When I run typical peak capacity credits against that slate, I get maybe 25 to 30 GW of firm capacity. Then take away the roughly 46 GW of retirements EIA has on the books through 2029 (EIA Table 4.5).

2030 grid shortfall: the inputs

Planned new capacity this year
43.4 GW solar · 24.3 GW batteries · 6.3 GW gas
86 GW
Firm capacity at peak
After typical peak capacity credits
25–30 GW
Scheduled retirements through 2029
EIA Table 4.5
~46 GW
Reserve margin gross-up
Applied to data center load
+15%

My back-of-envelope through 2030 grosses data center load up 15% for reserve margin. That's before electrification, reshored manufacturing or anything else that wants power. So treat these as floors.

To be fair, Grid Strategies thinks NERC is overcounting data center load and that most regions make it to 2030 fine (Utility Dive). I hope they're right. They're probably right about the speculative stuff. My bet is the middle scenario.

“Nameplate is the wrong number to stare at. What matters is what shows up at 6 pm on the hottest day of August.”

It's not the fuel, it's the iron

The gas is in the ground. Land isn't the problem either. The bottleneck is equipment and paperwork.

If you order a heavy-duty gas turbine from GE Vernova today, you're looking at 2031. Their backlog plus slot reservations hit 116 GW last quarter, and the whole company builds about 20 GW a year for the entire planet (OilPrice). Siemens Energy is sitting on 69 GW, Mitsubishi on 35 GW (EUCI). Large power transformers are running around 128 weeks, and substation units are past 160 (Simple Thread). Anybody who has waited on a GSU knows that number is optimistic.

Power equipment backlogs and lead times
EquipmentBacklog / Lead time

GE Vernova heavy-duty gas turbines

116 GW backlog + slot reservations; ~20 GW/yr global output

2031

Siemens Energy turbines

Backlog

69 GW

Mitsubishi turbines

Backlog

35 GW

Large power transformers

Lead time

~128 weeks

Substation units

Lead time

160+ weeks

The ISOs are already showing it

PJM

6,831 MW short

The 2028/29 auction missed the reliability requirement — the second straight auction where the whole RTO came up short, something that had never happened before. New Jersey ratepayers are paying capped prices for capacity that still isn't enough.

ERCOT

~474 GW in queue

Roughly 90% of large-load requests are data centers, against an all-time peak of about 91 GW. ERCOT has paused energization approvals for large compute loads, and the governor ordered an audit of the queue.

NERC

13 of 23 regions

The latest long-term assessment puts 13 of 23 regions at elevated or high risk over the next five years. You can argue with their load numbers. You can't argue with turbine delivery dates.

PJM is my backyard. Texas was supposed to be the fast lane.

What I'm telling people

  • Energized power before 2029 is the asset

    The building is the easy part. I'd rather own a brownfield site with an existing substation and a signed ESA than 2,000 acres of greenfield with a press release.

  • Bridge power becomes standard

    Recips, aeroderivatives, fuel cells and batteries carry phase one while the utility catches up. ERCOT already makes large loads keep backup that can serve at least half their demand.

  • Speed to power beats cheap power

    A market where you can energize in 24 months wins over one with cheaper energy and a 2031 date.

  • The headline pipeline will shrink — a lot

    Interconnection fees, $50k/MW security postings and queue audits will flush out the speculators. That's healthy. The projects that survive will still be fighting over the same transformers.

What I'm watching next

The PJM 2029/30 auction in December, the ERCOT audit results, and whether GE's slot reservations turn into firm orders.

Curious what others are seeing on time-to-power. Where are you actually getting energization dates you believe?

Join the discussion and see the full grid map on LinkedIn
SK

About the Author

Stephen Klenert

SVP of Optical Network Operations at 365 Data Centers

Stephen is a serial entrepreneur and infrastructure executive with over two decades of experience building carrier-grade networks. He founded and exited Atlantic Metro Communications, and now leads optical network operations at 365 Data Centers. He is also an angel investor in AI, space tech, and frontier sectors, and mentors at TEKnowledge World Wide.